Anti-Harassment Policy (Including Discriminatory and Sexual Harassment, Sexual Misconduct, Assault, Stalking and Relationship Violence)

Policy 412
Responsible Department:
Human Resources & Student Life
Responsible Administrator: Chief Human Resources Officer & Vice President for Student Life
Effective Date: May 1, 2012
Revised: August 15, 2016
Date of Scheduled Review: August 15, 2018


In order to comply with all applicable legal requirements prohibiting harassment against any member of the Abilene Christian University community. The purpose of this policy is to maintain a work and academic environment that is free of unlawful harassment. Finally, if such behavior occurs, this policy establishes a prompt and equitable procedure to resolve such complaints. See Sections V-XI or Standard Timeframes and Summary of Harassment Process for more information.


This policy applies to all members of the ACU community, including trustees, faculty, staff, students, volunteers, vendors, and visitors and serves to protect those community members from unlawful harassment regardless of where the alleged misconduct occurred. Although there is no geographical limitation, misconduct that is alleged to have occurred at a significant distance from the University or that is committed by a person outside the ACU community may be more difficult to investigate and remedy. Still, where the University’s response is so limited, it will advise the  reporting party regarding their right to file a complaint with the alleged perpetrator’s school or local law enforcement within the jurisdiction where the harassment occurred.


A. Prohibition Against Harassment - Harassment, as defined in Section IV, will not be tolerated at Abilene Christian University. Harassment is unchristian and uncivil behavior. It is a breach of community, which expresses disrespect, exploits and undermines relationships based on trust, and interferes with learning and productive work.

B. Responding and Reporting - Any person who experiences Harassment or who otherwise becomes aware of such an incident may object to this behavior by telling the perpetrator to stop and should promptly report the incident pursuant to this policy (see Section V). ACU encourages all reports to be made in good faith. If an investigation results in a finding that an accusation of discrimination, harassment or retaliation was made in bad faith or maliciously, the accuser may be disciplined appropriately. However, filing a complaint or providing information which a party or witness genuinely believes is accurate, but which is ultimately dismissed due to insufficient evidence or found to be untrue, does not constitute intentional false reporting.

C. No Retaliation - No member of the ACU community may be subject to further harassment, bullying, or retaliation by any employee or student for actions taken in good faith to file or encourage one to file a complaint, participate in an investigation, or oppose unlawful harassment. Retaliation includes things like intimidation, threats, or hostile actions based on someone’s complaint or participation in this process. A party may also be responsible for retaliation by someone affiliated with them (i.e., friend or family member). Any such behavior should be reported to the Title IX Coordinator or designee immediately. For more information regarding protections against retaliation, see Policy No. 421, Whistleblower Policy.

D. Impact of Complaint - Because a claim is not proof of prohibited conduct, a claim against an employee shall not be taken into account during performance review, promotion, reappointment, or other evaluation unless a final determination has been made that this policy has been violated. If necessary and appropriate, such decisions shall be deferred until the claim is resolved.

E. Notification and Training - In an attempt to prevent unlawful harassment, ACU will provide all employees and students with annual notification regarding this policy, where to file a complaint, and offer periodic training for faculty, staff members, and students, who will be required to participate in such training.


A. “Harassment” - includes Discriminatory Harassment or Sexual Harassment, as defined below.

B. “Discriminatory Harassment” - any detrimental action based on an individual’s sex, religion, race, age, color, national origin, veteran's status, disability, or any other characteristic protected by applicable law when such conduct:

  1. is so severe, persistent or pervasive that it unreasonably interferes with or limits the individual’s work or educational performance or one’s ability to participate in or benefit from the University’s educational program or activity; or
  2. creates a working, learning, or living environment that a reasonable person would find intimidating, hostile, or offensive.

It should be noted that the University is exempted from certain legal prohibitions against religious and sex discrimination as set out in its Nondiscrimination Policy.

Examples of Discriminatory Harassment may include, but are not limited to the following:

  • Threats or insinuations that a person's status or other condition of employment or academic status may be adversely affected because of one's legally protected characteristic.
  • Unwelcome verbal or written expressions, derogatory comments, epithets, degrading jokes, or innuendos regarding one's legally protected characteristic.
  • Posting objects, pictures, videotapes, audio recordings or literature that may embarrass or offend an individual because of one’s legally protected characteristic. Such material, if used in an educational setting, should be clearly and significantly related to educational purposes.
  • Bullying, defined as repeated and/or severe aggressive behavior likely to intimidate or intentionally hurt, control or diminish another person, physically or mentally because of one's legally protected characteristic.

C. “Sexual Harassment”
- unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature including unwelcomed sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal, non-verbal, or physical conduct of a sexual nature, including Sexual Misconduct, Exploitation, Stalking, or Relationship Violence as defined below, when:

  1. sufficiently serious, pervasive, or persistent as to create an intimidating, hostile, humiliating, demeaning, or sexually offensive working, academic, residential, or social environment under both an objective (a reasonable person’s view) and subjective (the complainant’s view) standard
  2. refusing or submitting to such conduct is made either explicitly or implicitly a term or condition of an individual's employment or status in a University course, program or activity.

Sexual harassment can occur regardless of the relationship, position and respective sex of the parties. Same-sex harassment violates this policy, as does harassment by a student of a faculty member or a subordinate employee of his/her supervisor.

Examples of Sexual Harassment may include, but are not limited to the following:

  • Unwelcomed sexual invitations, solicitations and flirtations
  • Threats or insinuations that a person's status or other condition may be either adversely affected by not submitting to sexual advance or positively affected by submitting to sexual advance
  • Unwelcomed verbal expressions of a sexual nature, including graphic sexual commentaries about a person's body, dress, appearance, or sexual activities; the unwelcome use of sexually degrading language, jokes or innuendos; unwelcome suggestive or insulting sounds or whistles; obscene phone calls
  • Sexually suggestive objects, pictures, videotapes, audio recordings or literature, placed in the work or study area, which may embarrass or offend individuals. Such material, if used in an educational setting, should be clearly and significantly related to educational purposes
  • Suggestive or sexually explicit posters, calendars, photographs, graffiti, or cartoons, including those distributed electronically
  • Offensive letters, email, text messages, posts on social networking sites, Internet images or transmissions or voicemail messages
  • Questions about one's sex life or experience

D. “Sexual Misconduct”
- a broad term encompassing any non-consensual physical contact of a sexual nature that varies in severity and consists of a range of behaviors or attempted behaviors. Prohibited Sexual Misconduct includes:

  1. Non-Consensual Sexual Contact - any intentional sexual touching, however slight, with any object or body part, by one person upon another, without consent or by force. Sexual touching includes any contact of a sexual nature (as determined using a “reasonable-person” standard) with the breasts, buttocks, groin, genitals, mouth, or body part of another. Sexual touching also includes an individual making someone else touch him or her with, on, or in, any of these body parts.
  2. Non-Consensual Sexual Intercourse - any sexual intercourse (anal, oral or vaginal), including sexual intercourse with an object or body part, however slight, by one person upon another without consent or by force. Sexual intercourse includes vaginal and/or anal penetration by a penis, object, tongue or finger, and oral copulation (mouth to genital contact or genital to mouth contact).

E. “Sexual Exploitation”
- when a person takes non-consensual sexual advantage of another for his/her own advantage or benefit, or the advantage or benefit of anyone other than the one being exploited, and that does not otherwise constitute one of the other sexual misconduct definitions. Examples include, but are not limited to: exposure of genitals or coercing  another to expose their genitals; invasions of privacy including non-consensual video or audio-taping of sexual activity;  voyeurism; capturing images for sexual gratification; inducing intoxication/incapacitation for the purposes of sexual activity; or aiding in the commission of sexual misconduct.

It is important to remember:

  • Previous sexual relationships and/or a current relationship may not be taken to imply consent.
  • Consent cannot be implied or inferred by attire, time or place (e.g., being invited to a person’s residence at a certain time of night).
  • Consent to sexual activity may be revoked at any time, as long as the revocation is communicated clearly, at which point sexual activity must cease immediately.
  • Consent cannot be given by minors, mentally disabled individuals or Incapacitated persons. Because Consent may never be provided by an Incapacitated person, one must assume Consent has been withdrawn should an individual become Incapacitated at any point during a sexual act or encounter.
  • Consent cannot be obtained through the use of fraud or Force (actual or implied).

F. “Consent”
- an informed, knowing, and voluntary decision to engage in mutually acceptable sexual activity. Consent is active, and not passive. Silence, in and of itself, should not be interpreted as consent. Consent must be part of a mutual and ongoing process by both parties throughout the sexual interaction. In other words, Consent to any one form of sexual activity cannot automatically imply consent to any other form of sexual activity. Consent may be given by words or actions as long as they create mutually understandable permission.

It is important to remember:

  • Previous sexual relationships and/or a current relationship may not be taken to imply consent.
  • Consent cannot be implied or inferred by attire, time or place (e.g., being invited to a person’s residence at a certain time of night).
  • Consent to sexual activity may be withdrawn by any person at any time. Once withdrawal of Consent has been expressed, the sexual activity must cease.
  • Consent cannot be given by incapacitated persons. However, Respondent must know or reasonably should have known that the Complainant was incapacitated at the time of the sexual activity. Because Consent may never be provided by an incapacitated person, one must assume Consent has been withdrawn should an individual become incapacitated at any point during a sexual activity.
  • An individual’s use of alcohol or drugs does not diminish that individual’s responsibility to obtain Consent.
  • Consent cannot be created through coercion, which is the use of express or implied threats, intimidation, or physical force which places an individual in fear of immediate harm or physical injury to self or others or causes a person to engage in unwelcome sexual activity. Coercion also includes administering a drug, intoxicant, or similar substance with the intent to impair that person’s ability to consent prior to engaging in sexual activity

G. “Incapacitated”
- any state where one cannot make a rational, reasonable decision because they lack the ability to understand the consequences of their actions. It literally means the inability to fully understand what is happening. First responders will assess someone’s capacity through the use of common questions to determine if a person is oriented to the person, place, time, and event. In other words, someone that does not know the who, what, when, where, or how of their sexual interaction lack capacity. This includes but is not limited to persons incapacitated based on their voluntary or involuntary use of drugs or alcohol, unconsciousness, blackout or sleep.
H. “Stalking” - unwanted and repeated course of conduct or behavior directed at a specific person that would causes a reasonable person to fear for his, her, or others’ safety or suffer substantial emotional distress.

H. “Force” - use of physical violence (such as pushing, hitting, pinning down)

I. “Stalking” - unwanted and repeated course of conduct or behavior directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable person to fear for his, her, or others’ safety or suffer substantial emotional distress.

J. “Relationship Violence” - includes both Domestic and Dating Violence. Domestic Violence, includes violent misdemeanor and felony offenses committed by the victim's current or former spouse or intimate partner, a person with whom the victim shares a child in common, a person who is cohabitating with or has cohabitated with the victim as a spouse or intimate partner, or person similarly situated to a spouse of the victim under domestic or family violence law, or any adult or youth protected under domestic or family violence law. Dating Violence means sexual or physical abuse or threats of such abuse by a person who has been in a romantic or intimate relationship with the victim. Whether there was such relationship will be gauged by its length, type, and frequency of interaction.

K. “Reporter” or “Complainant” - the person filing a report or complaint that the policy was violated.

I. “Accused” or “Respondent” - the person accused of violating the policy or responding to a complaint related to a violation.

V. EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE                   

If a person has concerns for their safety, they should contact ACU Police Department (ACUPD) (325-674-2911) or the Abilene Police Department (APD) (911). If on campus, ACUPD can also be contacted by activating one of the blue safety phones located throughout campus. Police can help with transportation to the hospital for sexual assault exams, safe housing on campus, connecting a person to other resources, and help in obtaining a restraining order. For more information,, see Anti-Harassment Resources.


A. Immunity - Sometimes, students are hesitant to report to university officials because they fear that they may be charged with policy violations, such as underage drinking, curfew violations, or other conduct violations at the time of the incident. To encourage reporting of Harassment, the university pursues a policy of offering complainants of Harassment immunity from being charged with policy violations related to the particular incident. This means that while violations to university policy cannot be completely overlooked, the university may provide education options rather than punishment, in such cases. This applies equally to all reporters and cooperating witnesses..

B.Timing of Complaints - There is no time limit for the submission of a complaint under this policy. While the amount of time needed to respond to the complaint will vary based on the nature of and/or complexity of the allegations and the evidence, any related investigation and outcomes will normally be concluded within 60 days of the receipt of the complaint (not including any appeals). For more detailed information regarding typical timeframes, see the Standard Timeframes and Summary of Harassment Process.

C. Reporting Options – A variety of resources are available at ACU and in the area around campus to assist those who have experienced gender-based or sexual harassment, including

sexual violence, and other violations of this Policy. Individuals considering making a disclosure to ACU resources should make sure they have informed expectations concerning privacy and confidentiality. ACU is committed to providing all possible assistance in understanding these issues and helping individuals to make an informed decision. It is important to understand that, while the University will treat information it has received with appropriate sensitivity, University personnel may nonetheless need to share certain information with those at the University responsible for stopping or preventing discrimination. For example, ACU employees, other than those who are prohibited from reporting because of a legal confidentiality obligation or prohibition against reporting (as further identified below), must promptly notify the appropriate Co-Coordinator about possible violations of this Policy, regardless of whether a complaint is filed. Such reporting is necessary for various reasons, including to ensure that persons possibly subjected to such conduct receive appropriate services and information; that ACU can track incidents and identify patterns; and that, where appropriate, ACU can take steps to protect the University community.

1. Direct Reporting to Anti-Harassment Co-Coordinators - Reports can be made directly to one of the two Anti-Harassment Co-Coordinators, whose information is listed below, or a Deputy Coordinator. For compliance purposes, these Co-Coordinators are the Title IX Coordinators for staff/faculty and students respectively.

Anti-Harassment Coordinator
Wendy Jones
Chief Human Resources Officer
Hardin Administration Building, Rm. 213
Anti-Harassment Co-Coordinator
Chris Riley, J.D.
Vice President for Student Life
122 McGlothlin Campus Center Room 44B
  Deputy Anti-Harassment Coordinator
Sherita Nickerson
Director of Compliance

2. Anonymous Reporting
Anonymous reports can be submitted online or by calling the anonymous hotline: 325-674-2594. This information goes to the ACU Office of General Counsel, who oversees the hotline, and will then be provided to one of the Co-Coordinators.

3. Confidential Reporting - If a person desires to identify themselves but desires that the  personally identifiable information not be reported to the university, , they are encouraged to speak with one of the following: Title IX Liaison; on or off-campus mental health professional or health care service provider; off-campus rape crisis resources; or off-campus clergy. See Anti-Harassment Resources for contact information about making a confidential reporting. 

4.Reporting to Responsible Employee - The university considers all other university employees (besides the Title IX Liaison and health care professionals mentioned above) and Student Organization Sponsors to be “Responsible Employees.” This means that if they receive reports about Harassment, they must promptly share that information with the appropriate Co-Coordinator, who can consider requests that the school maintain the reporter’s confidentiality.

In other words, notification to the Responsible Employees is official notice to the University but does not necessarily mean information will be shared with the accused individual. This information should include all relevant details needed to determine what occurred and address the situation including: name of the parties or witnesses and any relevant facts including date, time and location. To the extent possible, the Responsible Employee should explain this obligation to the reporter before the report is made, identify reporting options (i.e., confidential, direct, and law enforcement) and clarify that the student has an option to ask that the Title IX Coordinator maintain his or her confidentiality.

5. Reporting to Law Enforcement – Separate and apart from violations of this policy, many sexual misconduct offenses also are crimes in the state or locality in which the incident occurred. For that reason, the University also encourages any related criminal violations to be reported to ACUPD so that they can consider legal options. These options are available to the Complainants, who may change their minds about pursuing them at any time. For example,  Complainants may seek a protective order from a court against the alleged perpetrator(s); pursue a civil action against the alleged perpetrator(s); and/or participate in a law enforcement investigation and criminal prosecution of the alleged perpetrator(s).  ACUPD can be contracted at:

ACU Police Department
325-674-2305 (non-emergency)
325-674-2911 (emergency)
ACU Box 28010
Abilene, Texas 79699

It is important to note that reporting to ACUPD or any other law enforcement does not require filing criminal charges.  Regardless of whether an incident of sexual misconduct is reported to the police or the University, ACU strongly encourages individuals who have experienced sexual harassment to preserve evidence to the greatest extent possible, as this will best maintain all legal options for them in the future. Additionally, such evidence may be helpful in pursuing a complaint with ACU. While the university does not conduct forensic tests for parties involved in a complaint of sexual misconduct, the results of such tests that have been conducted by law enforcement agencies (including ACUPD) and medical assistance providers may be considered as evidence in an university investigation or proceeding, provided they are available at the time of the investigation or proceeding. Additionally, ACUPD has officers specifically trained to work with complainants and can explain their rights and options and provide relevant resources.

(a) Timely Public Warning - Under the Clery Act, the ACUPD must issue immediate timely warnings for certain types and circumstances of Sexual Misconduct reported to them if they believe they pose a substantial threat of bodily harm or danger to members of the campus community. If that is necessary, the University will make every effort to ensure that a victim’s name and other identifying information is not disclosed, while still providing enough information for community members to make safety decisions in light of the danger.

(b) Cooperation with Law Enforcement Requests - The University will comply with a law enforcement request for cooperation and such cooperation may require the University to temporarily suspend any fact-finding aspect of the investigation while the law enforcement agency is in the process of gathering evidence. The University will promptly resume its resolution/investigation of the complaint after receiving the request from law enforcement or as soon as notified that law enforcement has completed the evidence gathering process, whichever is earlier. This length of time will vary depending on the specific circumstances of each case but in no case will the university suspend any investigation for an ongoing or indefinite period.


A. Intake - Upon receiving the report, the Co-Coordinator or designee will provide complainant with a general understanding of this process including confidentiality, prohibitions against retaliation, and determine if interim measures are requested/necessary to protect the complainant’s or university community’s rights or safety.

B. Interim Measures and Other Resources - Interim remedial measures typically help the complainant avoid contact with the Respondent. These can include but are not limited to interim suspension, restrictions regarding movement on campus, removal from university housing, modification of classes or work schedules, and no contact orders. The complainant will also be informed regarding relevant resources, which include the assignment of a Title IX Liaison, academic or counseling services, and the right to report a crime to or seek a protective order from campus or local law enforcement. The Co-Coordinator or designee will also discuss confidentiality requests and determine how the complainant wishes to proceed: no action; proceed with informal resolution (if applicable); or proceed with formal resolution, which are each discussed below.

C. Preliminary Assessment – No later than three days after receiving the complaint, the Co-Coordinator or designee will make an initial assessment to determine if there is reasonable cause to believe the policy has been violated. No reasonable cause exists when, even assuming that all the facts reported by the complainant are true, no violation of the policy could exist. If no reasonable cause exists, the case will be closed and that conclusion reported in writing to complainant and respondent, if applicable. If there is reasonable cause, the complaint will proceed.


If the complainant refuses to participate, requests confidentiality and/or asks that the university not take action, the university’s ability to adequately respond to the complaint or report may be limited. Still, the Co-Coordinator or designee will evaluate such requests by balancing the complainant’s desire with the university’s responsibility to provide a safe and nondiscriminatory environment. In other words, while the university wants to respect the complainant’s request, it is important to note the law may require the university to override the request especially in cases of Sexual Misconduct or involving violence. In making this decision, the Co-Coordinator or designee will consider several factors including but not limited to:

  • Do circumstances suggest there is an increased risk of the alleged respondent committing additional acts (e.g., other complaints against the respondent or threats of addition action by respondent,)?
  • Do circumstances suggest there is an increased risk of someone else committing additional acts under similar circumstances (e.g., pattern of acting or certain location)?
  • The seriousness of the allegations (e.g., force or violence was used, weapon involved, multiple respondents)?
  • Whether the university possesses other means to obtain relevant evidence to proceed (e.g., security cameras or physical evidence)?

If the university determines that it can honor the complainant’s request, it will ask the complainant to sign a case drop form and the case will be closed with the understanding that the complainant can later change his or her mind. The university will still take all reasonable and necessary steps to respond to the complaint consistent with the complaint’s requests and determine whether interim measures are appropriate or necessary.

If the university determines that it must proceed with a resolution or investigation despite the complainant’s request for confidentiality, the university will take care to protect the complainant’s information as far as possible. In other words, only the people who need to know will be told, and information will be shared only as necessary with investigators, witnesses, and the accused individuals. Moreover, in additional to interim measures, the complainant may request that the university inform the respondent that he or she asked the university not to investigate or seek discipline, and the university will honor that request. In this type of case, the Co- Coordinator will serve as the complainant using the process outlined below.


In any cases that do not involve violence or Sexual Misconduct, a complainant may wish to informally resolve the complaint. An informal resolution might take the form of the Co-Coordinator, appropriate supervisor/administrator, or complainant discussing the issues with the respondent in order to establish the kind of behavior that may be deemed objectionable and securing the cessation of such behavior; it might also take the form of informal mediation between the parties.

When complaints are resolved informally, the offending party should be cautioned that repetition of such conduct could lead to formal complaint or investigation. The use of an informal complaint and resolution procedure is optional. Nothing in this informal complaint process is meant to discourage an individual from filing a formal complaint. In instances where complainant does not wish to engage in the informal procedure, where informal resolution is not appropriate (e.g. violence or Sexual Misconduct), or in situations where attempts at the informal procedure are unsuccessful, the formal procedure may be followed. Written notice of the outcomes of any informal procedure will be given to complainant and responded by the Co-Coordinator within one week of the outcomes.


If the complainant wishes to proceed with a formal resolution or the university determines that a formal resolution should proceed, the Co-Coordinator will begin an investigation or assign the investigation to a Deputy Coordinator or an independent outside investigator, who will conduct the investigations under supervision of the Co-Coordinator. The goals of the investigation are to determine (1) if a preponderance of the evidence shows that the alleged violation occurred (i.e., its more likely than not) and (2) if so, what actions should the university take to respond to the violation and prevent reoccurrence. In so doing, the university strives for the investigation to be sufficient, reliable and impartial including the opportunity for both complainant and respondent to provide evidence and witnesses to the investigator, as applicable. For the sake of clarity, the university’s process for investigating complaints is not a court hearing. Rather, the university’s formal resolution process is an internal administrative investigation of an alleged policy violation where both parties are afforded opportunities to both review and appeal the initial investigation finding(s).

A. Initial Meetings, Parties Statements, and Pre-Finding Resolution

1) Initial Interview with Complainant and Complainant Form – To begin the investigation, the Co-Coordinator or designee will interview the Complainant regarding the facts surrounding the complaint. Relevant information included but is not limited to: identification of the respondent and relationship to the university; description of the incident(s), including dates, locations, and the presence (and identity) of any witnesses or other who might have been subject to the same or similar harassment; a list of any other information that complainant believes to be relevant including supporting documents or other evidence including text messages or voicemails; and description of the impact of respondent’s actions on complainant. The Co-Coordinator or designee will also ask Complainant to complete a general Complaint Form containing basic information about the complaint made against the Respondent, such as time, date, location, and a brief description of the allegations underlying the alleged violation.

2) Notice and Initial Meeting – The Co-Coordinator or designee will provide the Complainant Form to respondent via email or in person as written notice of the compliant and investigation and schedule an appointment to discuss the complaint.  The Co-Coordinator or designee will also provide Respondent with a general understanding of the policy including confidentiality, the prohibition against retaliation and explain any interim measures in place and consider respondent’s request for additional interim measures. The respondent will also be informed regarding relevant resources, which include the assignment of a Title Liaison and counseling services.

3) Pre-Findings Resolution of Complaint - After reviewing the complaint form and the meeting, the respondent has the right to end the investigation by accepting responsibility for the conduct alleged in the Complaint Form. In order to inform his/her decision in this regard, the Respondent can ask the Decision Maker to outline potential sanctions. If the Respondent accepts responsibility, the complaint would be officially referred to the appropriate Decision Maker to decide the sanctions against Respondent (See Sections IX. C and D).

4) Initial Respondent Interview - If the Respondent contests the complaint, the Co-Coordinator or designee will interview the Respondent regarding the facts surrounding the complaint. Relevant information included but is not limited to: identification of respondent’s relationship with complainant; response to the complaint including description of the incident(s), including dates, locations, and the presence (and identity) of any witnesses; and a list of any other information that respondent believes to be relevant including supporting documents or other evidence including text messages or voicemails.

5) Respondent’s Refusal or Failure to Participate - Refusal or failure by the Respondent to meet, cooperate regarding the complaint and notices provided, or participate in an interview may result in the adjudication of the complaint without input from the Respondent.

B. Fact-Finding Investigation - It is the responsibility of the trained and neutral investigator, not the parties, to gather the evidence relevant to the complaint to the extent reasonably possible. During the course of the investigation, the investigator may utilize some or all of the following methods, in whatever order the investigator deems most appropriate: interviewing the parties and key witnesses in order to gather relevant information; document or evidence gathering or review; consulting expert witnesses including local law enforcement or forensic experts (as necessary). Throughout the process, the investigator will maintain appropriate documentation; provide status updates to the parties; and disclose appropriate information to others only on a need-to-know basis consistent with applicable law.

  1. Influencing Witnesses - In their statements, the parties have the right to identify any relevant witnesses and the investigator will attempt to contact and interview any witnesses that he or she deems relevant to the resolution of the complaint. Witnesses should only be encouraged to cooperate and to speak the truth. If either party, individually or through others, attempts to threaten, intimidate, or otherwise improperly influence a witness, such action will result in a separate disciplinary action by the university.
  2. Advisor of Choice – The parties have the right to have one Advisor of his/her choice present during any interview with the party they are advising. The Advisor may not have personal involvement regarding any facts or circumstances of the alleged misconduct. The Advisor's only function shall be to assist and/or consult with the party they are advising. The Advisor may not act as a spokesperson or in any way interfere with the meeting or investigation. The Advisor may be an attorney but participation shall be limited, as stated above.
  3. Disclosure of Evidence - The investigator will determine if the evidence presented, which may include written statements, electronic messages or social media posts, physical evidence, etc., are relevant and probative to whether the alleged conduct occurred. If so, in the interest of fairness and equity, such evidence maybe disclosed to both parties if relevant to further investigation or the outcome of the case.
  4. Conflicts of Interest – If either of the parties contends that the Co-Coordinators, investigator or Decision Makers, has a conflict of interest in fulfilling their responsibilities under this policy, the university encourages the party to raise those issues with the Co-Coordinator so that it can be considered and addressed by the University’s General Counsel

C. Findings and Report
- Upon conclusion of the investigation, the investigator will make a written findings report outlining  whether a violation occurred, based on a preponderance of the evidence (whether a policy violation is more likely than not). The findings will include a summary of the investigation and analysis of the relevant evidence supporting the findings.

D. Presentation of Finding and Decision - After the findings report is reviewed by the Co-Coordinator, Co-Coordinator will present the findings to the parties separately either in person or via email. If both parties accept the findings, the appropriate Decision Maker, as set out below, will impose sanctions for the violation, after consultation with the Co- Coordinator. The appropriate Decision Maker depends on the primary status of the respondent: for accused students, it is the Senior Advisor to the President; for accused staff, it is the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; and for accused faculty, it is the Provost.

If either party rejects the findings, the appropriate Decision Maker identified above will determine whether it is more likely than not that the accused individual violated the policy. In making this decision, the findings of the investigation will be considered and given great deference by the Decision Maker, but are not binding on his/her decision. The Decision Maker may ask the investigator to conduct additional investigation before making his or her decision or meet with both parties and the Co-Coordinator.

If the Decision Maker concludes that it is more likely than not that the policy was violated, they will also consider sanctions for the violations, after consultation with the Co-Coordinator. If the Decision Maker concludes that the preponderance of the evidence does not support a violation, the parties will be notified as set out below.

E. Remedies - Anyone who violates this policy will be subject to appropriate disciplinary action. Disciplinary measures available to remedy Harassment or retaliation include, but are not limited to, the following: verbal warning/reprimand; written warning/reprimand in employee or student files; requirement of verbal and/or written apology to victim; mandatory education and training on harassment by means of reading assignments, videos, classes or other presentations; referral for psychological assessment or treatment; alternate placement, suspension, probation, termination, or expulsion; or other action university deems appropriate under the circumstance. Additionally, interim remedial measures may become permanent.

In determining what disciplinary or corrective action is appropriate, the university shall consider the totality of the circumstances, including but not limited to: number of victims and harassers involved; employment/student positions or status of the victims and harassers; relevant portions of prior disciplinary record of the harasser; threatened or actual harm caused by the harassment; frequency and/or severity of the harassment.

If a student or student groups are found to be in violation of this policy, any of the sanctions set forth in the ACU Student Code of Conduct may also be involved.

If a faculty member is found to have violated this policy and if the discipline is determined to include termination, this process will substitute for any other including Special Termination in the Faculty Handbook, as is required under the equity requirement under the law.

F. Notifications - When a determination is reached regarding findings and/or sanctions, the appropriate Decision Maker will provide both complainant and respondent with concurrent written notice of the same within seven (7) days of the decision through email.

The notice will inform both parties regarding the outcomes (where or not the university found the alleged violation occurred), any sanctions that impact both parties (e.g., no contact orders, suspension), and that a redacted version of the findings report is available for inspection by both parties upon request. The complainant should also be informed of any other remedies offered to him or her individually or actions taken by the university to prevent recurrence. Finally, the notice will also include information regarding the parties’ right to appeal. Sanctions, especially those requiring separation from campus, are implemented immediately. The Decision Maker has discretion to allow a student respondent to complete any pending coursework remotely, if deemed appropriate by the relevant faculty member.


Either party may appeal the findings or sanctions imposed by filing a written appeal to the Office of General Counsel (via email within five  (5) business days of the above notification. (However, the respondent cannot appeal admissions of pre-finding responsibility or findings that he or she accepted). The ONLY grounds for appeals are as follows:

A. The investigatory process, as outlined in the policy was not followed, and the failure to do so significantly and adversely impacted the outcome of the investigation;

B. To consider new evidence unavailable during investigation that could substantially impact the original finding or sanction. A summary of the new evidence must be included along with a valid reason it was not available earlier and how it would have impacted the outcome.

C. The sanctions imposed are substantially inconsistent with the type of discipline issued to others who were found to be responsible for substantially similar violations.

D. The findings are not supported by the evidence or are otherwise arbitrary.

After receiving an appeal, the Office of General Counsel will share the appeal with the relevant Co- Coordinator and notify the opposing party of the appeal and allow him or her the opportunity to file a response. The opposing party will have five (5) business days to do so.

The appeal will be considered by one of the two administrators mentioned above that did not render the initial decision. For example, if a student appeals a decision of the Senior Advisor to the President, the Vice President and CFO or the Provost, will consider the appeal.

The procedure governing the consideration of appeals include the following:

  1. If the person hearing the appeal determines that an appeal should be granted, it should make every effort to return the appeal to the original administrator for reconsideration (remand) where appropriate. In such cases, the decision made on remand by the original administrator is not appealable;
  2. Appeals will be confined to review of the written documents including the original findings reports, the written appeal, and any responses. However, the person hearing the appeal may ask the investigator or parties for clarification regarding something in the written documents; and
  3. Appeals are not an opportunity for the appeals committee to substitute their judgment for that of the original administrator merely because they disagree with his/her findings and/or sanctions. Instead, they are to be deferential making changes only where there is clear error or compelling justification.
  4. The appeal finding, which will be in writing and provided to both parties concurrently through email, will be final and cannot be appealed.